+44 (0) 20 8044 4422

Early Stage vs the Rest of the World

Early Stage vs the Rest of the World

While much has been written about what persuades investors to buy stakes in businesses, a lot of the discussion revolves around the investors' decision process in relation to assessing seed or start-up investment opportunities. Advice is often targeted at "the pitch", the qualities of the founder/s, etc. However, in the market for mature and, ahem, "post-revenue" businesses — and contrary to Silicon Valley thinking, established businesses making a profit do exist — criteria, decisions, and funding work by slightly different rules.

Early Stage vs the Rest of the World

Early-stage opportunities involve high risk, high cash-burn businesses. Investors who take equity or quasi-equity in these businesses expect most of these ventures to tank and a small fraction to become so enormously successful that they more than compensate for losses elsewhere. A VC would expect to get a higher return on money invested in (risky) early-stage businesses than they would get in safer, more liquid markets. The ROI expectation is a fund-level expectation (i.e., it's the overall return expected from the whole portfolio of investment).

However, the mergers acquisitions (M&A) market marches to a different beat. It's composed of trade and institutional investors, private equity firms, family offices, and others, and they are looking for businesses with demonstrated viability, positive cash flow, and a loyal customer base. Essentially, they want established and proven businesses. Every business "acquired" must be a business that can be sold later for a higher price, usually after creating value by driving growth and/or reducing inefficiencies.